Ursa Major
Not A Therian After All?
by
, February 21st, 2021 at 06:49 PM (301 Views)
I am almost sure I am ‘hearted and not a therian after all. I’m not unhappy about this theory itself, but I do feel silly and regretful because of the way I was so sure about being a therian. I wonder if I've been lying to myself and others without realizing it.
Until about 3-4 months ago, when I began digging deeper into the history of modern therianthropy, I thought being ‘hearted meant that the experience was “not as meaningful” as being therian. I see a sort of hierarchy in the therian community, with being a therian at the top and being otherhearted or animal-hearted at the bottom.
Bears influence the way I perceive myself, how I think I should look at times, my behavior, my diet, etc., but I don’t identify as one. A part of me is very connected to bears and many of my behaviors/the way I think could be described as bear-like. It means more to me than “liking” or “relating to” an animal, which is what I was told otherheartedness meant since I joined the community in 2018.
I recently read a text called "Common Themes in the Early Animal-hearted Scene" that resonated deeply with me. Linked here: https://web.archive.org/web/20181219...-hearted-scene
I am not the most articulate today so please forgive me if none of this makes any sense. I'm a little down as well, which I hope has not seeped into my writing. If anyone has any advice or words of affirmation, it wouldn't hurt to hear them.
I am still learning to interpret the nature of my experiences, which I think is something we all go through as we learn which word or label works and which does not.